No community start suggestion yet.
How can a woman collect her kesubah in Yehuda when both spouses agree she wasn't touched during erusin? The Beis Yaakov asks why this differs from other cases where uncertainty prevents collecting money. The shiur distinguishes between evidentiary questions and halachic categories - in Yehuda it's not about proving what happened, but about losing the right to claim pesach (פסח) besulah.
This shiur addresses a fundamental question raised by the Beis Yaakov regarding an apparent contradiction in the Gemara (גמרא)'s treatment of monetary disputes involving uncertainty. The Gemara previously established that when there is doubt about whether someone is expert (baki) in the laws of pesach (פסח) pesulah, a woman cannot collect her kesubah because of the principle that one cannot extract money based on uncertainty (ein motzi mamon b'safek). However, in the case of Yehuda, even when the husband claims pesach besulah and appears credible, the woman still collects her kesubah. The shiur carefully analyzes Rashi (רש"י)'s interpretation, focusing on the key phrase 'd'amrinan' (we say). Rashi explains that in Yehuda, where couples were accustomed to seclude themselves (miyachad) during erusin, we operate under the assumption that intimate relations occurred. This is not merely a probability calculation but reflects our understanding of human nature in such circumstances - similar to the Talmudic principle of 'fire and flax' (esh b'neoret) which assumes certain outcomes from predictable situations.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 9a-9b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!