No community start suggestion yet.
How can witnesses in distant cities create eidus zomim when their location testimony requires assumptions about travel impossibility? The shiur builds on the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s requirement that contradictory facts be "matzui v'yadua" - both possible and commonly known - to distinguish between seeing and assuming in halachic testimony.
The shiur analyzes a fundamental question about the nature of eidus (halachic testimony) through the lens of eidim zomemim cases in Makkos 5a. The discussion centers on two scenarios: witnesses testifying about a murder in one location while being contradicted by witnesses who saw them elsewhere, and the halachic requirements for such contradiction to be valid. Rabbi Zweig examines the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s formulation that we only disqualify witnesses when the contradictory evidence is "matzui v'yadua" (possible and known to all). The key insight emerges from analyzing why this double requirement exists - it's not enough that something is merely possible; it must also be commonly known to the general public.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Makkos 5a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
