A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Erev Pesach (פסח) have a shorter pre-meal restriction than regular Erev Shabbos (שבת), and what does "eating matzah with ta'avah" actually mean? The shiur argues that ta'avah refers to genuine enjoyment rather than mere hunger, making the hidur mitzvah (מצוה) about savoring the matzah experience. This reframes whether different types of matzah throughout Pesach require the same hasayvah standards.
This shiur examines Pesachim 99b, focusing on the Mishna's statement "Erev Pesach (פסח) samuch l'minchah lo yochel adam ad shetechshach" - that one may not eat close to minchah time on Erev Pesach until dark. Rabbi Zweig begins by analyzing the fundamental machlokes between the commentators regarding the precise timing. Rashi (רש"י) interprets "samuch l'minchah" as "kodem l'minchah me'at" (shortly before minchah), while Rashbam specifies this as half an hour, and the Rambam (רמב"ם) also uses the term "me'at" (a little). Rabbi Zweig questions how half an hour can be considered "me'at," arguing that such a duration is quite significant rather than minimal. The shiur explores the Gemara (גמרא)'s answer that distinguishes between Erev Pesach and other Erev Yom Tov/Shabbos (שבת) occasions. According to Rabbi Yehuda's position, on Erev Shabbos and Erev Yom Tov the restriction begins "min minchah u'maylah" (from minchah onwards), while on Erev Pesach it's only "me'at" before. This creates a puzzling scenario where the restriction on Erev Pesach (3:28) is actually less stringent than on regular Erev Shabbos (3:30), raising questions about the underlying reasoning.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Pesachim 99b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
