A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rosh Hashanah begin the Aseres Yemei Teshuvah when we don't recite vidui or perform explicit teshuvah rituals? The Rambam (רמב"ם) distinguishes two levels of teshuvah - transactional repair of specific sins versus transformational redefinition of our relationship with Hashem (ה׳). Rosh Hashanah represents the higher level through Kabbalas Malchus Shamayim, choosing to define life itself as closeness to Hashem rather than merely fulfilling obligations.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a fundamental question: why does Rosh Hashanah begin the Aseres Yemei Teshuvah when there are no explicit teshuvah rituals or vidui recited on this day? He resolves this by analyzing the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s discussion of bechirah (free will) in Hilchos Teshuvah rather than in Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah, and by distinguishing between two entirely different levels of teshuvah. The rabbi explains that the Rambam presents an apparent contradiction regarding teshuvah's effectiveness. In Perek Aleph, the Rambam outlines four categories of sins requiring different levels of atonement - some needing teshuvah alone, others requiring teshuvah plus Yom Kippur, punishment, or even death. However, in Perek Zayin, he describes teshuvah as immediately transformative, capable of changing someone from a rasha at night to a tzaddik by morning, with Hashem (ה׳) immediately accepting their mitzvos and prayers.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Hilchos Teshuvah Perek 1 and 7
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.