No community start suggestion yet.
What gave Shimon and Levi the right to kill the entire city of Shechem, and why did Yaakov object? The shiur develops the Rambam (רמב"ם)-Ramban (רמב"ן) dispute over whether Noahide law enforcement is a matter of justice or sovereignty, showing that jurisdiction is limited to each state's territory. The brothers argue that as Bnei Yisrael they possess universal jurisdiction, establishing that a Jewish woman's sanctity differs fundamentally from the nations—the very test that would earn them the name Yisrael.
This shiur addresses the difficult narrative of Parshas Vayishlach where Shimon and Levi destroy the city of Shechem following Dinah's abduction. Yaakov objects strenuously on two grounds: first, that they have disgraced him in the eyes of the inhabitants of the land, and second, that they have endangered the family's survival through this reckless act. The brothers respond with a single cryptic line: "Should our sister be treated like a harlot (zonah)?" This response seems entirely non-responsive to Yaakov's objections, yet Yaakov falls silent. The shiur seeks to understand the legal justification for the brothers' actions and the meaning of this exchange. The Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Melachim provides a legal framework: one of the seven Noahide laws is the obligation to establish courts (dinim) to enforce the other six laws. The Rambam states that failure to establish such courts is itself a capital offense. In the case of Shechem, the Rambam explains that the entire city deserved death because they witnessed Shechem's abduction of Dinah and failed to judge him. The Ramban (רמב"ן) challenges this position with four questions: (1) Why not simply say they deserved death for idolatry, which the Torah (תורה) explicitly mentions? (2) How can a passive failure to act (not judging) constitute a capital offense when only active transgressions carry such penalties under Noahide law? (3) The Yerushalmi states that a Noahide judge may walk away from a case even after knowing the correct verdict, so how can failure to judge be capital? (4) If the Rambam is correct that they were obligated to destroy Shechem, why was Yaakov criticizing his sons rather than leading the charge himself?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 34 (Parshas Vayishlach)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
