A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Kol Nidrei nullify vows at the start of Yom Kippur, just before we make new commitments to God? The shiur distinguishes between resolutions based on promises and true commitment based on recognizing absolute truth. When we understand what is genuinely right rather than forcing ourselves through willpower, we act naturally without internal struggle.
Rabbi Zweig addresses the challenge of making meaningful resolutions during the High Holy Days that will last beyond initial enthusiasm. He questions why Kol Nidrei, which nullifies vows, serves as the opening to Yom Kippur, seemingly setting a tone that promises are meaningless just before people make new commitments to God. The answer lies in understanding the fundamental difference between resolutions and true commitment. Using Ibn Ezra's commentary on "Thou shall not covet," Rabbi Zweig explains that the Torah (תורה) doesn't ask us to suppress feelings but to change our mindset. Ibn Ezra teaches that we don't desire what we perceive as completely impossible (like marrying the Queen of England), so the solution to envy is recognizing that what belongs to others is entirely outside our realm of possibility.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kol Nidrei service and Yom Kippur themes
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why was Leah considered the first person in history to thank God when naming Yehuda? The shiur distinguishes between retrospective gratitude for past benefits and prospective gratitude that commits future conduct. By embedding God's name in Yehuda, Leah pledged his entire life would carry out divine values—true Torah gratitude that creates ongoing obligation rather than eliminating debt.
Why does halacha require returning to the same innkeeper rather than allowing free market choice? The shiur develops that meaningful relationships are inherently invasive - both guest and host sacrifice independence and privacy. Breaking such relationships sends a devastating message that the other person has become intolerable, which explains Avrohom's sensitivity as both guest and host.
Why does Rashi explain Yosef's harnessing his own chariot as motivated by honor rather than love for his father? The shiur distinguishes between love-based relationships (requiring equal respect) and honor-based relationships (requiring greater respect for the other). Since harnessing his chariot was demeaning to Yosef's station as viceroy, only the mitzvah of honoring parents could justify it—love should never require self-demeaning acts.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
