No community start suggestion yet.
What is the halachic status of a ger katan who grows up and rejects Judaism? Rashi (רש"י) and Tosafos (תוספות) dispute whether such gerus creates only rabbinic obligations versus full Jewish status. The shiur develops a fundamental distinction between gerus that makes one an "Israeli" (part of Am Yisrael nationally) versus gerus that creates full religious obligation in all 613 mitzvos.
The shiur analyzes a fundamental dispute between Rashi (רש"י) and Tosafos (תוספות) regarding ger katan (a minor convert). When the Gemara (גמרא) discusses whether such a person can marry a Jewish woman and receive knas (fine for rape), Tosafos assumes this proves the ger has full Jewish status, while Rashi holds it's only a rabbinic level of Jewishness affecting yayin nesach prohibitions. Rabbi Zweig develops a comprehensive framework distinguishing between two types of gerus. The first creates "Israeli" status - membership in Am Yisrael as a nation without full mitzvah (מצוה) obligations. The second is gerus tzedek, creating complete religious obligation. This explains the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s complex position in Hilchos Melachim regarding conversions during Dovid and Shlomo's reigns, where the Rambam says converts were "yotzei mechlal goyim" (left the category of gentiles) but their ultimate status remained uncertain. The shiur applies this framework to resolve the contradiction between different Talmudic passages about gerei arayos (converts for ulterior motives) - they are considered gerim regarding nationality but goyim regarding certain ritual obligations like shechita. The analysis extends to yefas toar (beautiful captive woman), where the Torah (תורה) permits a unique form of forced conversion creating Israeli status with kiddushin taking effect, though without full mitzvah obligation. This resolves Tosafos' question about Amnon and Tamar - since Maacah (Tamar's mother) underwent gerus under duress, making her an Israeli but not fully Jewish, when Tamar later converted properly, she gained the status of "ger she-nitgayer katan she-nolad" (like a newborn), eliminating her family relationship to Amnon. The Rambam extends this principle further than Rashi, holding that any ger who is yotzei mechlal goyim has tofeis kiddushin (effective kiddushin), while Rashi limits this chiddush to the special case of yefas toar.
Kesubos 11a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
