A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does individual teshuva (תשובה) during Aseres Yemei Teshuva work immediately without requiring a complete heart, unlike communal teshuva year-round? The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s distinctions reveal that these ten days activate our internal relationship with Hashem (ה׳) rather than the external Creator-creation dynamic. During this period, Hashem sees Himself in us like a parent sees themselves in their child, making teshuva a recognition of essence rather than a formal request.
The shiur begins with an analysis of the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s Hilchos Teshuva (תשובה) regarding the differences between individual and communal repentance. The Rambam states that during the ten days between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, an individual's teshuva is 'yafa' (beautiful), 'miskabeles' (accepted), and 'miyad' (immediately). However, for a community, teshuva is effective year-round but only receives 'aniya' (a response) and requires 'lev shalem' (a complete heart). The speaker identifies three key differences: 1) Individual teshuva during Aseres Yemei Teshuva doesn't require lev shalem, 2) It's 'miskabeles' rather than just answered, and 3) It works 'miyad' (immediately). The fundamental insight emerges through the interpretation of 'L'Dovid Hashem (ה׳) ori v'yishi' - where 'ori' (my light) represents Rosh Hashanah and 'yishi' (my salvation) represents Yom Kippur. The speaker explains that humans have two relationships with Hashem: one external (dealing with Him as Creator and King) and one internal (the 'chelek Elokai mima'al' - divine spark within us). During Aseres Yemei Teshuva, we access this internal relationship where Hashem sees Himself in us, similar to how a parent sees themselves in their child. This creates an immediate connection that doesn't require the same formal request-and-response dynamic of the rest of the year. The concept of 'dirshu Hashem b'himotzo' during these days means finding Hashem within ourselves rather than seeking Him externally. The speaker explains that during this period, our words themselves create reality ('miskabeles') because we're not dealing with distance but with recognition of our essence. Even partial sincerity works because to whatever extent we're earnest, that much automatically awakens the relationship. Yom Kippur represents the culmination where 'Hashem yishi' - He does the work of salvation while we need only acknowledge our need ('asinu chatanu'). The speaker emphasizes that Aseres Yemei Teshuva should not be viewed as an appeals court or burden, but as an extraordinary opportunity for closeness. Hashem actively seeks our return, like a parent changing a child's diapers, because He loves us and sees Himself in us. The ultimate message is that these days represent unparalleled divine closeness where the process of teshuva becomes natural and instinctive, leading to increased acts of chesed (חסד) and mitzvos as expressions of this divine connection.
Rambam Hilchos Teshuva
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
