A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Talmud (תלמוד) say Haman accomplished what forty-eight prophets could not? A Midrash reveals that the greatest gift of Purim (פורים) was not victory but the 'great mourning' that transformed Jewish consciousness of time. When facing annihilation, each day became more precious - the opposite of Amalek's philosophy that treats tomorrow as disconnected from today, allowing endless deferral of responsibility.
This shiur delves into profound questions about Purim (פורים) and the concept of time in Jewish thought, beginning with the puzzling Talmudic requirement to drink on Purim until one cannot distinguish between cursing Haman and blessing Mordechai. The speaker questions why this level of intoxication is necessary and what deeper meaning lies behind cursing someone already destroyed. The discussion shifts to analyzing the battle with Amalek, focusing on Moshe's instruction to Yehoshua to fight 'tomorrow' when the war was happening 'today.' The Talmud (תלמוד) presents this as one of five ambiguous verses in the Torah (תורה), where 'tomorrow' could refer either to the battle or to Moshe's prayer on the mountain. A key Midrash reveals that all downfalls of Amalek are connected to the concept of 'tomorrow,' as seen in Esther's delay in revealing Haman's plot.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Megillas Esther, Parshas Beshalach - Battle with Amalek
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
