No community start suggestion yet.
Why does God judge us at all when He owns us completely and could eliminate us for even one sin? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: by blowing shofar we coronate Hashem (ה׳) as King, and He then self-imposes a radical limitation—no longer dealing with us as Owner but as Sovereign, granting us the right to a fair trial, compassionate judgment, and the requirement of being 51% positive to merit life. This reframes Rosh Hashanah from an oppressive day to the ultimate expression of divine love.
Rabbi Zweig begins by addressing a deep discomfort many feel on Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur—the oppressive weight of being judged. He argues that until we understand the fundamental starting point of our relationship with Hashem (ה׳), it is nearly impossible to have a healthy feeling going to shul on the Yamim Noraim. The question is stark: if God created us ex nihilo, doesn't He own us completely? And if He owns us, why does He owe us a trial at all? An owner can discard what he owns for any imperfection—one stain, one flaw, and the item is discarded. Why should Hashem grant us a day in court? The shiur's central insight is that God's ownership is absolute, yet He offers us an extraordinary covenant: if we coronate Him as King by blowing the shofar, He will no longer relate to us as Owner but as Sovereign over subjects. This is the meaning of "Ola Elokim b'teruah"—God ascends with the teruah, i.e., when we blow shofar, we transform the relationship. A Midrash in Parshas Emor explains that when God sits on the throne of justice, we blow shofar, and He moves from the seat of strict judgment to the seat of compassion. But the Midrash says we blow twice: once to establish Him as King (thereby limiting His ownership), and once to appeal for mercy as His children.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Midrash Rabbah, Parshas Emor; Rosh Hashanah liturgy and themes
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why are sins automatically forgiven for three categories - converts, those elevated to leadership, and those who marry - without any teshuvah required? The shiur distinguishes between soulmate marriages (which create complete identity transformation) and companion marriages, using Esav's third wife as the paradigm. When true soulmates unite, they literally become new people, explaining why sins are forgiven rather than merely sealed.
Why does the Torah emphasize Esav selling his birthright over his other sins like murder and adultery? The key insight is that "vayivez" means Esav despised himself, not just the birthright - reflecting devastating self-worth issues rooted in inconsistent parental love and unproductive time use. Poor self-image is worse than behavioral sins because it can't be simply repented from and blocks all growth.
What does it mean that Leah was 'hated' despite being loved by Yaakov? The shiur redefines hatred (sina) not as animosity but as having separate agendas - two people can love yet remain fundamentally divided in priorities. Yaakov's seven years of labor for Rochel exemplifies making your spouse your agenda rather than maintaining parallel lives.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
