A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Haggadah emphasize Rabbi Elazar ben Azariah's age of seventy when discussing the mitzvah (מצוה) to remember the Exodus? The shiur develops that seventy represents internalization - when mitzvos become second nature rather than burdens. True freedom means finding genuine satisfaction in Torah (תורה) observance, which parents must model for their children on Seder night.
Rabbi Zweig begins by addressing the apparent contradiction of the Pesach (פסח) Seder - we simultaneously celebrate our freedom while recounting the painful experience of slavery. He poses the fundamental question: what is the ultimate goal we're trying to accomplish on Pesach night, and what message should we convey to our children? The shiur centers on a passage from the Haggadah where Rabbi Elazar ben Azariah states, 'Behold, I am like seventy years old, and I wasn't able to merit to bring the proof that we're supposed to speak about the redemption of Egypt at nighttime.' Rabbi Zweig explains 'the rest of the story' - how Rabbi Elazar ben Azariah, though only eighteen years old, was appointed as Rosh Yeshiva when Rabbi Gamaliel was deposed for being too forceful in his leadership. When his wife protested that he was too young and lacked white hair, a miracle occurred and he developed eighteen rows of white hair, making him appear like a seventy-year-old.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Haggadah - Rabbi Elazar ben Azariah's statement
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
