No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) re-introduce the plagues in Parshas Bo, and why must the Jewish people borrow wealth from Egypt? The shiur develops the yesod that Yetzias Mitzrayim was not a transfer from one master to another, but a complete undoing of slave mentality. Through speech, payment for labor, and Hashem (ה׳)'s vengeance on Egypt, Bnei Yisrael were restored to dignity as His children, not broken servants—revealing that service to Hashem is for our sake, not His.
Rabbi Zweig opens by analyzing several textual difficulties in Parshas Bo. The Torah (תורה) provides a new preamble to the plagues after seven have already occurred, stating that Hashem (ה׳) brings them so that we can tell our children and grandchildren how He "played with" the Egyptians. This introduction would have been more logical before the first plague. Additionally, Hashem tells Moshe to go to Pharaoh "because I have hardened his heart"—seemingly eliminating the purpose of negotiation. The Torah also emphasizes the imperative that Bnei Yisrael borrow wealth from the Egyptians, and the Gemara (גמרא) explains this is so Avrohom Avinu will not complain that the promise of "they will leave with great wealth" was unfulfilled. Yet the wealth taken at the splitting of the sea was even greater, so why was the Egyptian wealth necessary? Furthermore, Pesach (פסח) is called Chag HaMatzos, the holiday of matzah, which the Torah also calls lechem oni—bread of affliction—making it paradoxical as a symbol of freedom. The parsha also contains an unusual concentration of mitzvos related to speech: the mitzvah (מצוה) of Haggadah, telling children, and Chazal's teaching that Pesach means "peh sach"—the mouth that speaks. Rabbi Zweig explains the significance of speech based on a Gemara in Yoma. The Gemara addresses the verse "worry in the heart of man pushes him down" (dagas b'lev ish yeshichena) and offers two remedies: yeshiach midato—push it out of your mind—or yeshichenu l'acher—speak it over with others. The second solution is puzzling: how does speaking about a problem help? Rabbi Zweig explains that when a person is worried, he feels overwhelmed by forces beyond his control—things loom larger than life. The act of verbalizing a problem gives it boundaries and definition. Once something is expressed, it is limited, and once limited, it can be mastered. Speech is the ultimate act of self-definition and control. This is why therapy works: not because it offers solutions, but because articulating trauma extricate a person from being submerged in it. This explains why Holocaust survivors often could not speak about their experiences for decades—the trauma was too overwhelming to define. Only when they could finally speak about it did they regain control over it.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Bo
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
How can sinas chinam lead someone to harm himself even more than his enemy? The shiur develops that sinas chinam requires self-hatred first — only someone alienated from himself will damage himself to hurt others. The Bar Kamtsa host and R. Zecharya ben Avkulas both exhibited this self-alienation, showing that proper anava restores love of both self and others.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
