Where exactly should Chanukah (חנוכה) candles be lit - in one's courtyard, in the public domain, or at the specific entrance? The shiur analyzes the fundamental machlokes between Rashi (רש"י), Tosafos (תוספות), and the Rambam (רמב"ם) to reveal a deeper chakira: is Chanukah lighting a personal obligation (chiyuv gavra) to publicize the miracle, or a house-based obligation (din bayis) like mezuzah that sanctifies the dwelling itself?
This shiur provides an extensive analysis of Gemara (גמרא) Shabbos (שבת) 21b, focusing on the machlokes between major Rishonim regarding the proper location for lighting Chanukah (חנוכה) candles. Rabbi Zweig begins by examining the Gemara's statement that the Chanukah light should be placed 'al pesach (פסח) beiso mibachutz' (at the entrance of his house, outside). Rashi (רש"י) interprets this to mean lighting in one's chatzer (courtyard), not in the reshus harabim (public domain), while Tosafos (תוספות) maintains that one should always light in the reshus harabim for maximum pirsumei nisa (publicizing the miracle). The shiur identifies an apparent contradiction in Rashi between two different passages - on 21b Rashi says not to light in reshus harabim, while on 22a he permits lighting either in the chatzer or reshus harabim. Rabbi Zweig resolves this by explaining that Rashi distinguishes between two cases: when there's no tzuras pesach (doorway structure), one can light anywhere in the chatzer; when there is a tzuras pesach, one must light tefach hasamuch (within a handbreadth) of the entrance. The Rambam (רמב"ם) presents a third position, always requiring lighting tefach hasamuch lapesach regardless of circumstances. The shiur then explores the case of someone living on an upper floor (aliyah). According to Rashi, if the upstairs resident has a designated entrance (pesach) in the courtyard, he lights downstairs; if he only has access via a ladder without a proper entrance, he lights upstairs in his window. The Rambam, however, rules that anyone living upstairs lights upstairs regardless of whether they have a downstairs entrance. This leads to Rabbi Zweig's fundamental insight about the nature of the mitzvah (מצוה) itself. He argues that the Rambam views Chanukah lighting as a din bayis (obligation on the house) similar to mezuzah, rather than a personal obligation. Just as mezuzah makes the house into a Jewish home, Chanukah lighting makes the house into a 'house of pirsumei nisa.' This explains why the Rambam always requires lighting tefach hasamuch lapesach - like mezuzah, it must be affixed to the house structure itself. According to other Rishonim, the mitzvah is personal (chiyuv gavra), focusing on the individual's obligation to publicize the miracle. The shiur concludes by noting that this fundamental dispute affects practical halacha (הלכה), particularly regarding multiple residents in one dwelling and the exact location requirements for the lights.
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How can Shabbos observance atone for the idolatry of Enosh's generation? The Rambam's reading shows that generation sought God through physical intermediaries rather than direct connection. Proper Shabbos observance creates authentic divine experience that naturally displaces attraction to spiritual substitutes - like tasting real coffee exposes ersatz as meaningless.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Shabbos 21b-22a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Gemara say one Shabbos protects from Amalek while two Shabboses bring redemption? The shiur applies a principle from Kiddushin about repetition changing psychology: the first time doing anything is experimental, but the second demonstrates genuine desire. True Shabbos connection with Hashem requires moving beyond spiritual curiosity to authentic internalization.
