No community start suggestion yet.
When does an almanah who is still a besulah get married? The Mishna says besulos marry Wednesday and almanos Thursday, but creates a contradiction since some almanos are besulos. Rashi (רש"י) disagrees with the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s approach to this inconsistency.
This shiur analyzes the opening Mishna of Masechta Kesubos regarding the wedding days for different types of women. The Mishna states that a besulah (virgin) marries on Wednesday and an almanah (widow) marries on Thursday, with the reason being that Beis Din sits on Monday and Thursday, allowing immediate clarification of any marital issues. However, this creates a fundamental problem: what about an almanah who is still a besulah - a widow who never consummated her first marriage? The Rambam (רמב"ם) resolves this by changing the language of the Mishna from 'almanah' to 'beulah' (non-virgin), making the distinction clear between virgins and non-virgins rather than between single women and widows. The Yerushalmi supports this by stating that an almanah besulah would indeed marry on Wednesday. Rashi (רש"י) takes a different approach, maintaining the Mishna's original language and explaining that only a besulah requires immediate Beis Din review, not an almanah besulah. This leads to a deeper discussion about when one is obligated to clarify a safek sefeika (double doubt). The Chem DaShem questions why Rashi would require clarification of a safek sefeika when the Rama rules that even when clarification is possible, it's not required. The shiur proposes that Rashi distinguishes between cases where there is a reayah (evidence of wrongdoing) versus mere speculation. When a woman was mezanah (promiscuous), this creates a reayah that requires investigation even on a safek sefeika. However, when dealing with an almanah who may have been with her first husband (which is not inherently forbidden), this doesn't constitute a reayah requiring investigation. This distinction explains why the Mishna differentiates between besulah and almanah - only in the former case is there sufficient concern to require immediate Beis Din clarification.
Kesubos 2a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
