No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Gemara (גמרא) accept a mother's testimony about her child's lineage for some purposes but not others? The shiur develops the Rava Magid's distinction that her credibility depends on whether the prohibition is d'oraisa or d'rabbanan, and explores how cheskas eim mahani lebas only applies to disqualifications derived from the mother herself.
This shiur examines a complex sugya in Kesubos 13b regarding when a mother is believed about her child's lineage, particularly focusing on the different applications for marriage to a kohen versus marriage to a regular Jew. The central question is why the Rambam (רמב"ם) doesn't codify certain halachos mentioned in the Gemara (גמרא) about believing a mother's testimony. The Pischa Basra (Rava Magid) provides a fundamental distinction: the mother is only believed regarding prohibitions that are d'rabbanan in nature. When dealing with a safek mamzer (doubtful illegitimate child), since safek mamzer is treated leniently as a d'rabbanan issue for marriage to regular Jews, the mother's testimony is accepted. However, for marriage to a kohen, where additional restrictions apply that may be d'oraisa in nature, her testimony becomes insufficient.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 13b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
