No community start suggestion yet.
Can someone be religiously observant yet untrustworthy in business? A Gemara (גמרא) in Kiddushin 40a categorizes four types of people: good to God and good to people (tzaddik tov), good to God but bad to people (tzaddik she'eino tov), bad to both (rasha ra - including a ganav), and bad to God but good to people (rasha). The shiur explains that mitzvos bein adam l'chaveiro require not just compliance but genuine caring—the recipient must feel valued, not merely an object of obligation.
The shiur opens with a textual question from Parshas Mishpatim: Why does the Torah (תורה) write "Im kesef talveh es ami" (if you lend money to My people) using the conditional word "im" when lending money is an obligation, not optional? Rashi (רש"י) cites a Mechilta identifying three instances where "im" means "you must" rather than "if," yet the question remains—why not simply omit "im" and write "Kesef talveh" (you must lend)? The inclusion of the word creates confusion rather than clarity. Before addressing this textual issue, Rabbi Zweig confronts a dangerous misconception prevalent in some religious communities: the idea that one can be righteous in observance between man and God while being dishonest or unethical in business dealings. Many rationalize this dichotomy, thinking such a person is "halfway there" or at least deserves partial credit for religious observance. The Gemara (גמרא) in Kiddushin 40a completely dismantles this notion.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Mishpatim - Shemos 22:24 (Im kesef talveh)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
