No community start suggestion yet.
Why do eid zomeim receive malkos in cases where they cannot pay monetary compensation or receive other punishments? The shiur develops the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s yesod that all eid zomeim punishment requires the witnesses to have imposed a 'din rasha' - a status of wickedness - which then transfers back to them. This principle resolves apparent contradictions between the Rambam and Gemara (גמרא) regarding testimony about slavery versus theft.
This comprehensive shiur examines the complex laws of eid zomeim (perjurers) found in Masechta Makkos, focusing on cases where false witnesses cannot receive monetary punishment, physical punishment, or death penalty but still incur malkos (lashes). The shiur begins with the Gemara (גמרא)'s discussion of witnesses who falsely testify about someone being a ben gerushah ben chalutza (son of a divorced woman or chalitza), and the principle that such witnesses receive malkos even when they cannot pay monetary compensation. Rabbi Zweig analyzes the fundamental question of how we derive the laws of eid zomeim from the Torah (תורה), examining the Gemara's statement 'remez le-eidim zomemim min ha-Torah min heichan' - where is there a hint to perjurers in the Torah. The shiur explores Rashi (רש"י)'s interpretation versus the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s understanding of the pasuk 'v'hitzadiku es ha-tzaddik v'hirshiu es ha-rasha' (they shall justify the righteous and condemn the wicked), demonstrating how this verse serves as the source for eid zomeim laws.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Makkos 2b-3a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
