No community start suggestion yet.
Why does God judge with mercy on Rosh Hashanah rather than strict justice? The Akedah reveals that Avrohom recognized God as a father, not just a king, trusting that divine commands serve our ultimate benefit. God's mercy reflects our tzelem Elokim - the divine spark within us means He relates to us as a parent who never abandons their child.
This shiur addresses the spiritual depression that often accompanies the approach of Rosh Hashanah, when we confront our failures to change from the previous year and feel tempted to give up on ourselves. The speaker explores a fundamental theological question: if God created the world with justice but added mercy because we couldn't survive pure justice, why isn't our existence still just a gift (nahama d'kisufa - bread of shame)? To answer this, the shiur analyzes the Akedah (binding of Isaac), which is central to Rosh Hashanah's liturgy and essence. The speaker addresses why Avrohom's willingness to sacrifice Isaac was uniquely significant when millions throughout history practiced child sacrifice. Drawing from a Midrash, he explains that God swore an oath after the Akedah that just as Avrohom could have legitimately refused God's contradictory command (having been promised Isaac would be his heir) but didn't, so too God will judge with mercy rather than strict justice on Rosh Hashanah.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
