No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Eliezer change his test when he meets Rivka at the well? The shiur develops the Maharal's framework: Eliezer originally devised a test of ve'ahavta l'reiacha kamocha—minimal imposition for minimal gain. But when he saw the waters rise to greet Rivka, he recognized something extraordinary and tested instead for Avrohom's chesed (חסד)—giving far more than the recipient needs, driven by an innate love of kindness that creates true communal unity.
This shiur offers a profound analysis of Eliezer's test for Rivka at the well, addressing multiple textual difficulties and developing a revolutionary understanding of chesed (חסד). The analysis begins with the Maharal's famous question: Eliezer saw chesed in Rivka, yet he gave her a nose ring (nezem zahav beka mishkalo) that Chazal identify as corresponding to the machtzis hashekel used for communal offerings (avodah). Why give a symbol of avodah when he only witnessed chesed? Rabbi Zweig identifies several textual discrepancies that demand explanation. First, there is a significant difference between what Eliezer tells Hashem (ה׳) his test will be versus what actually happens at the well. Then there are further discrepancies when Eliezer recounts the story to Lavan and Besuel. In the original test design (24:14), he plans to ask for a drink and the girl will offer to water the camels as well. But in the actual encounter (24:17), he asks for "a little water" (ma'at mayim), and Rivka responds that she will draw water (eshov) for the camels, not merely give them to drink. When Eliezer retells the story to her family, he presents yet another version, switching which account represents the test and which represents what happened.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 24:14-21 (Parshas Chayei Sarah)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
