A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does a Midrash connect Chanukah (חנוכה) to the word 'ko' from Avrohom's statement at the Akedah? The shiur develops that both episodes share the theme of transcending natural limitations through total dedication to divine purpose. Just as Avrohom could sacrifice for Hashem (ה׳)'s will beyond logic, the Maccabees fought impossible odds, teaching that Jewish existence operates above time and nature when consecrated to eternal goals.
This shiur explores the profound meaning behind Chanukah (חנוכה) by examining the various etymologies of the word itself. Rabbi Zweig presents three explanations for 'Chanukah': first, as 'Chanu Kaf-Hey' - they rested on the 25th of Kislev when the Jews finally overcame the Greeks; second, as connected to 'chinuch' (education); and third, as dedication or consecration of the Temple altar. The central question addressed is what eternal message Chanukah provides that warrants eight days of celebration. The shiur focuses on a fascinating Midrash that finds a hint to Chanukah in the word 'ko' (here) from the Akedah, when Avrohom tells his servants 'we will go until here (ko) and bow down, then return.' Rabbi Zweig explains that the rabbis questioned why Avrohom said 'here' instead of 'there,' leading to this connection with Chanukah. Another occurrence of 'ko' appears when Hashem (ה׳) promises Avrohom 'ko yihiyeh zaracha' (thus shall be your seed). Rashi (רש"י) explains this as Hashem telling Avrohom his children will transcend even the stars and constellations, meaning they will be above time itself.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Gemara say young men who curse deserve death? The shiur uses Esau's degradation of his birthright to reveal that cursing functions as psychological relief from achievement pressure. By describing ourselves in base terms, we lower expectations and forfeit our potential - which explains why the practice destroys our very purpose for existence.
How could Rabbi Akiva's 24,000 students fail in basic respect when their teacher championed 'love your neighbor'? The core issue was 'shelo nahagu kavod zeh bazeh' - they withheld honor until others proved worthy, rather than starting with presumptive respect for human dignity. The mitzvah of judging favorably requires validating others' inherent worth, which then earns the same treatment from God.
Why does Judaism demand such intensive Torah study when other religions function without this emphasis? Idle people inevitably become cynical, tearing down others' accomplishments, then ultimately deny absolute values to rationalize their own lack of achievement. Torah study provides unlimited opportunity for genuine self-improvement, creating healthy self-worth that preserves both personal dignity and society's moral foundations.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
