No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) present two seemingly redundant accounts of the Exodus story and the Korban Pesach (פסח)? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: Korban Pesach embodies two distinct aspects of redemption—the commitment to serve Hashem (ה׳) (represented by eating), and the miraculous salvation from death at midnight (represented by slaughtering). These correspond to the daytime exodus and nighttime liberation, explaining the dual narratives and the unique status of tefillin as symbols of both dimensions.
Rabbi Zweig opens by identifying a fundamental structural question in Parshas Bo: the Torah (תורה) presents two seemingly repetitive sections (Kadesh and V'haya Ki Yavi'acha) that both discuss the sanctification of the firstborn, remembering the Exodus, and the obligation of tefillin. Why this apparent redundancy? Additionally, both sections connect tefillin to the Exodus, yet use different terminology—calling the hand tefillin an "os" (sign) and the head tefillin a "zikaron" (remembrance) in one place, and "totafos" (related to speaking) in another. The shiur proceeds to examine a series of intricate questions in Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary. Most strikingly, Rashi appears to contradict himself three times regarding the meaning of "Pesach (פסח)": first explaining it as "passing over," then presenting the Targum's translation of "compassion" before insisting it means "passing over," and finally offering both interpretations as equally valid. Additionally, Rashi states in one place that the Jews were obligated to bring the Korban Pesach only in Egypt and then in Eretz Yisrael (not in the wilderness), yet in Bamidbar he calls it a "disgrace" that they only brought it once during forty years in the desert, implying an annual obligation.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Bo, Shemos 12-13
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
How can sinas chinam lead someone to harm himself even more than his enemy? The shiur develops that sinas chinam requires self-hatred first — only someone alienated from himself will damage himself to hurt others. The Bar Kamtsa host and R. Zecharya ben Avkulas both exhibited this self-alienation, showing that proper anava restores love of both self and others.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
