No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Moshe enter Eretz Yisrael east of the Jordan but was denied entry to the west? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction between two types of claims to the land: inheritance from Shem (giving territorial rights to all descendants, including Esau) versus the unique covenant with Avrohom (creating special divine relationship only west of the Jordan). This explains the strategic marriages in Bereishis and Yehoshua's final address.
The shiur addresses several fundamental questions about Eretz Yisrael and the marriages recorded in Sefer Bereishis. Rabbi Zweig begins by noting the apparent contradiction regarding Moshe's entry into the land - while tradition teaches that Moshe never entered Eretz Yisrael, Rashi (רש"י) clearly states that Moshe did enter east of the Jordan and even argued that this should nullify the entire decree against him based on the principle of 'neder shehutam miktzaso hutirkulo' (a partially nullified vow is entirely nullified). The shiur develops a revolutionary framework based on a Rashi in Parshas Lech Lecha. When the Torah (תורה) states 'v'haknani az ba'aretz' (the Canaanites were then in the land), Rashi explains that the Canaanites (descendants of Cham) had illegitimately conquered this territory from the descendants of Shem, to whom Noah had originally allocated it. Crucially, Rashi adds that Hashem (ה׳) promises to 'return' the land to Avrohom's descendants 'because your children are descendants of Shem.'
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Vaeschanan
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
