A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why do we celebrate Purim (פורים) on the day of rest rather than the day of victory itself? The pattern mirrors Shabbos (שבת) and Yom Tov, where we celebrate the menucha that makes us part of Hashem (ה׳)'s malchus. Matanot LaEvyonim replaces the usual Yom Tov restrictions because it captures the Torah (תורה)'s essence of proper holiday celebration through caring for others.
This shiur provides a detailed analysis of Megillat Esther Chapter 9, verses 17-19, focusing on how the Jews celebrated their victory and the establishment of Purim (פורים). The lecture begins by examining why the celebration occurs on the day of rest (Yom Asher Nachu) rather than the day of battle itself, which is unusual since most Jewish holidays commemorate the actual day of the miracle. Rabbi Zweig explains that this reflects a pattern found in other holidays with a din of lo ta'aseh (prohibition of work) - Shabbos (שבת) and Yom Tov - where we celebrate the menucha (rest) that results from the event rather than the event itself. The celebration focuses on the effect the miracle had on us, specifically that we became part of Hashem (ה׳)'s malchus (kingdom), rather than just celebrating the miracle itself. A significant portion of the analysis centers on understanding the switch between 'mishteh v'simcha' and 'simcha v'mishteh' in different verses. The Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchot Megillah is cited to explain that simcha refers to eating meat (basar) while mishteh refers to drinking wine. The shiur proposes that when the Jews first celebrated their victory that year, they were emotionally dead (emotionally like in aveilus) from months of anticipation of death, so they needed wine first to restore their emotional state, then food for physical celebration. However, when establishing the permanent holiday observance, the order switched to simcha v'mishteh because healthy people celebrating a Yom Tov follow the normal Torah (תורה) pattern of 'ein simcha ela b'basar v'ein simcha ela b'yayin' - first physical sustenance (meat), then spiritual elevation (wine).
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Megillat Esther 9:17-19
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
