No community start suggestion yet.
What constitutes onus (duress) when conditions in gittin or kiddushin are not fulfilled? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction between two types of onus: where you simply cannot perform vs. where you want to perform but cannot. This analysis explains apparent contradictions in the Rambam (רמב"ם) and reconciles different positions.
This shiur presents an in-depth analysis of the concept of onus (duress/circumstances beyond one's control) in the context of conditional gittin and kiddushin. The discussion begins with a question from the Chasam Sofer regarding a case in the Ittur where Talmidei Chachamim debated whether there is onus in kiddushin, and why this would create any practical problem for the rabbis. Rashi (רש"י)'s approach is examined in detail, particularly his statement that by gittin one must be able to claim 'onus hayisi' (I was under duress). The shiur analyzes what Rashi means by 'tainas onus' - the requirement to assert one's duress - and how this differs from simply being unable to perform an action. According to Rashi's reading, it's not sufficient to merely demonstrate that circumstances prevented performance; one must actively claim and substantiate the onus.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 2b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
