No community start suggestion yet.
The Sefer HaChinuch notes that while Torah (תורה) law governs how to divide inheritance, there's no obligation to leave one at all. This parallels the Gemara (גמרא)'s ruling that supporting children is only required until age 6-7. The deeper purpose is ensuring children recognize parental care stems from love, not legal duty.
This shiur examines a fascinating insight from the Sefer HaChinuch regarding the Torah (תורה)'s laws of inheritance found in Parshas Pinchas and codified in the eighth perek of Bava Basra, Yesh Nochlim. The Sefer HaChinuch points out what appears to be an anomaly: while the Torah provides detailed halachos about how to divide an inheritance (first to sons, then to daughters if no sons exist), there is actually no mitzvah (מצוה) requiring a person to leave an inheritance at all. The obligation is purely conditional - IF there is an inheritance, THEN these are the rules for distribution. The Sefer HaChinuch contrasts this with the practice among non-Jews of his era, where civil law mandated that people must leave inheritances to their children. This creates a paradox: Jews, who are known for their devotion to their children's welfare, have no legal obligation to provide inheritance, while non-Jews, who live more for the present moment, are legally required to provide for future generations.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why is arranging marriages, hiring teachers, and organizing charity permitted on Shabbos—even though mundane speech is forbidden? The Gemara in Masechta Shabbos brings ten examples to prove that these activities aren't merely overriding Shabbos restrictions—they are themselves Shabbos conversations. The shiur develops the fundamental insight that shalom (harmony) is the essence of Shabbos, and any discussion promoting communal unity, family peace, or care for others is a fulfillment of Shabbos, not a compromise.
Why does hiddur mitzvah—beautifying the mitzvos—appear alongside emulating Hashem in the same pasuk (Zeh Keli v'anveihu)? Drawing from Mesilas Yesharim, the shiur explains that beautifying mitzvos creates yirah and awe, not love. Awe allows us to become batel to Hashem's identity, and through that hisbatlus—not mere imitation—we absorb His midos and truly become like Him.
Bava Basra, Perek Yesh Nochlim
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.