No community start suggestion yet.
When is a mother believed about her child's lineage, particularly regarding Kohen status? The shiur analyzes the dispute between Rav Elazar and Rav Yochanan about maternal testimony. Rabbi Zweig resolves apparent contradictions by distinguishing between d'oraisa and d'rabbanan prohibitions and clarifies that 'shtuki' here means excluded from Kohen status, not pasul for marriage.
This shiur provides an in-depth analysis of a complex sugya in Kesubos 13b dealing with the halachic status of a child of uncertain paternity (vlad shtuki) and when a mother's testimony is believed regarding lineage. The discussion centers on a fundamental dispute between Rav Elazar and Rav Yochanan about the credibility of maternal testimony concerning her child's status. Rabbi Zweig begins by examining Rashi (רש"י)'s interpretation and identifies several difficulties. According to Rashi, the case involves a woman claiming her child's father is a Kohen, making the child eligible for Kohen status. However, Rav Elazar holds that while a mother is believed regarding herself (due to her chazakah), she is not believed regarding her daughter when it comes to prohibitions that are d'oraita in nature, such as a bas challal marrying a Kohen.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 13b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
