No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) permit yefas toar when it contradicts the principle of self-control? The shiur develops a yesod that war creates an unavoidable yetzer hara for domination—not lust—because a soldier kills and benefits simultaneously. This dynamic leads to resentment toward the woman and child, producing the ben sorer umoreh. The key difference from Yishmael: a committed parent changes everything.
The shiur addresses a fundamental difficulty in the parsha of yefas toar: how can the Torah (תורה) permit something forbidden (lo dibra Torah k'neged yetzer hara) when the Torah elsewhere demands that we control even our thoughts in a military camp? According to Rashi (רש"י), the soldier cannot live with the captive woman until after the full conversion process, yet the Torah still considers this a concession to human weakness. This appears to contradict both the principle of self-control and logic itself—normally thoughts are harder to control than actions, yet here the Torah demands thought-control but permits action. Rav Zweig introduces a novel understanding: the yetzer hara of yefas toar is not about physical desire but about domination. In a milchemes reshus (discretionary war), the Torah obligates soldiers to go to war for economic reasons—when another nation refuses to trade resources that Israel needs (violating their responsibility of tikkun achut hamedinos, international brotherhood). When a soldier both executes enemies and personally benefits from their assets, the mitzvah (מצוה) itself creates an almost impossible psychological situation: he cannot help but feel he has the right to dominate. This is not his personal yetzer hara—the Torah's own commandment generated this sense of domination. Therefore, lo dibra Torah k'neged yetzer hara means the Torah made a concession specifically where the mitzvah itself created the overwhelming drive.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Ki Seitzei 21:10-21
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
