A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) permit yefas toar when it contradicts the principle of self-control? The shiur develops a yesod that war creates an unavoidable yetzer hara for domination—not lust—because a soldier kills and benefits simultaneously. This dynamic leads to resentment toward the woman and child, producing the ben sorer umoreh. The key difference from Yishmael: a committed parent changes everything.
The shiur addresses a fundamental difficulty in the parsha of yefas toar: how can the Torah (תורה) permit something forbidden (lo dibra Torah k'neged yetzer hara) when the Torah elsewhere demands that we control even our thoughts in a military camp? According to Rashi (רש"י), the soldier cannot live with the captive woman until after the full conversion process, yet the Torah still considers this a concession to human weakness. This appears to contradict both the principle of self-control and logic itself—normally thoughts are harder to control than actions, yet here the Torah demands thought-control but permits action. Rav Zweig introduces a novel understanding: the yetzer hara of yefas toar is not about physical desire but about domination. In a milchemes reshus (discretionary war), the Torah obligates soldiers to go to war for economic reasons—when another nation refuses to trade resources that Israel needs (violating their responsibility of tikkun achut hamedinos, international brotherhood). When a soldier both executes enemies and personally benefits from their assets, the mitzvah (מצוה) itself creates an almost impossible psychological situation: he cannot help but feel he has the right to dominate. This is not his personal yetzer hara—the Torah's own commandment generated this sense of domination. Therefore, lo dibra Torah k'neged yetzer hara means the Torah made a concession specifically where the mitzvah itself created the overwhelming drive.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Ki Seitzei 21:10-21
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
How can sinas chinam lead someone to harm himself even more than his enemy? The shiur develops that sinas chinam requires self-hatred first — only someone alienated from himself will damage himself to hurt others. The Bar Kamtsa host and R. Zecharya ben Avkulas both exhibited this self-alienation, showing that proper anava restores love of both self and others.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.