No community start suggestion yet.
Why isn't closing a door with a deer inside considered psik reisha when the Shulchan Aruch says psik reisha doesn't apply if the action could be done without that result? The shiur explores whether trapping depends on the inherent nature of the action or the specific circumstances, developing insights about melacha definition and intent.
This shiur tackles a fundamental question in psik reisha: the Shulchan Aruch establishes that if a melacha can be performed without an inevitable secondary result, then even when done with that result, it's not considered psik reisha. Rabbi Zweig applies this principle to the Gemara (גמרא)'s case of closing a door when a deer is inside. The Rashba permits this even with intent to trap the deer, provided one also intends to secure the house. The Ran objects that this should constitute psik reisha regardless of intent. The Shiltei Gibborim attempts to resolve this by arguing that since it's possible to close doors without trapping animals, this doesn't qualify as psik reisha. However, Rabbi Zweig finds this reasoning problematic - the Rashba explicitly permits the action even with intent to trap, making the psik reisha analysis seemingly irrelevant.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 6b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
