A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
When is Beis Hillel lechumra and Beis Shammai lekula regarding kiddushin? The shiur analyzes a difficult Tosafos (תוספות), arguing that the Mishna in Eduyos refers to kiddushin with less than a shever pruta—creating only safek kiddushin according to Beis Hillel (via shema shever pruta bemodah) while Beis Shammai holds it invalid. This reading answers why Tosafos doesn't simply cite cases where ledevar shevali could equalize the positions.
This shiur offers an intensive analysis of Kiddushin 2a, focusing on a challenging Tosafos (תוספות) that asks why the Mishna in Eduyos considers Beis Hillel lechumra and Beis Shammai lekula in matters of kiddushin. The central problem is understanding what kind of case creates a true chumra for Beis Hillel—one where Beis Shammai cannot achieve the same result. The shiur begins by examining the Mishna's statement that according to Beis Shammai, kiddushin requires a dinar, while Beis Hillel accepts a pruta. Tosafos asks a fundamental question: if the issue is simply the woman's status, why isn't this considered a chumra for Beis Shammai? Since according to Beis Shammai she would already be an eishes ish to the first man, how can we say Beis Hillel is machmir when they merely say she's married to a second man?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kiddushin 2a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.
