A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why can't one eat matzah on Erev Pesach (פסח) if it must be eaten letayovon, yet the Gemara (גמרא) discusses eating matzah al hasova without appetite? The shiur reframes Tosafot's analysis by distinguishing between the basic matzah mitzvah (מצוה) and zecher korban Pesach, suggesting letayovon means 'with enjoyment' rather than just 'hungry.'
This shiur examines a complex Tosafot on Pesachim 99b regarding the prohibition of eating matzah on Erev Pesach (פסח). The Mishna states that one cannot eat on Erev Pesach because matzah must be eaten letayovon (with appetite). Tosafot raises a difficulty: the Gemara (גמרא) discusses eating matzah b'tzeit (early in the meal) when one has only one kezayit of matzah, followed by eating at the end al hasova (when satisfied) - seemingly without letayovon. Rabbi Zweig questions Tosafot's premise, noting that when eating matzah early versus late, one is fulfilling two different mitzvos: the basic mitzvah (מצוה) of matzah versus the zecher (remembrance) of korban Pesach. The shiur explores whether Tosafot redefines letayovon from meaning 'hungry' to meaning 'with enjoyment' - allowing for different levels of fulfillment. The analysis continues with Tosafot's statement 'ad shetechshach' (until dark), questioning why one cannot make kiddush early on Pesach night and eat, similar to what is done on Shabbos (שבת). Rabbi Zweig proposes several explanations: perhaps the prohibition exists because eating early would compromise the higher level hidur (beautification) of eating when truly hungry, or perhaps it extends the prohibition of eating matzah sheir (regular matzah) beyond when one would normally be allowed after accepting Yom Tov early. The discussion includes practical implications about the timing of kiddush, the nature of kedushat hayom (sanctity of the day), and whether chag hamatzot begins before one can fulfill the mitzvah of matzah. Throughout, the shiur demonstrates the intricate balance between different levels of mitzvah fulfillment and the principle that one should not compromise a d'oraita (biblical) hidur for a d'rabbanan (rabbinic) obligation.
Pesachim 99b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
