A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why was the real Chanukah (חנוכה) battle against the Mityavnim - assimilated Jews - rather than the Greeks themselves? The shiur argues that external threats only succeed when we're internally compromised by abandoning our spiritual identity. Chanukah's derabanan status creates a unique annual window for developing bitul - recognizing that serving Hashem (ה׳) is pure privilege, not burden.
This shiur delves into the spiritual dimension of Chanukah (חנוכה), beginning with an analysis of the concept of echad (oneness) and the spiritual essence of Levi, which stems from nullifying one's ego before Hashem (ה׳). The speaker illustrates how identical actions can have completely opposite spiritual meanings - one person performing an act of self-sacrifice may be reinforcing their ego while another performing the same act achieves complete bitul (nullification) to HaKadosh Baruch Hu. This distinction represents the fundamental difference between the approaches of Kayin and Hevel. The main focus shifts to understanding the true nature of the Chanukah conflict. Rather than viewing it primarily as a war against external Greek forces, the shiur emphasizes that the real devastating battle was against the Mityavnim - Jews who had become susceptible to Greek thought and values. The speaker notes that in the original Chanukah story, it was actually a Jew, not a Greek, who was prepared to offer the forbidden sacrifice before Matisyahu intervened.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Chanukah
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
