No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Hashem (ה׳) command the Jews to borrow silver and gold from the Egyptians rather than simply take it during Makkas Choshech? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: Avodas Hashem is entirely for our benefit, not a burden we bear for Hashem's sake. The borrowing enabled the Egyptians to have "buy-in" to Klal Yisrael, fulfilling Avrohom's universal concern that even Mitzrayim should share in the redemption.
Rabbi Zweig opens by addressing a troubling question: Why did Hashem (ה׳) instruct the Jewish people to borrow silver and gold from the Egyptians, knowing they would not return it? The Gemara (גמרא) justifies this by noting that in Alexander's court, the Jews counter-claimed for unpaid wages during slavery. But this explanation itself is problematic—why structure the transaction as "borrowing" at all? Hashem could have enriched the Jews through the spoils at Yam Suf (which were even greater), or simply allowed them to take Egyptian wealth during Makkas Choshech when they could see everything and the Egyptians were immobilized. The Gemara states that Hashem said "Daber na"—please ask them to borrow—"shelo yomar oso tzaddik," so that "that tzaddik" (Avrohom) should not say Hashem fulfilled the slavery but not the promise of leaving with great wealth. This formulation itself raises questions: Why does fulfilling Hashem's word depend on what Avrohom will say? And why refer to Avrohom as "oso tzaddik" rather than "Avrohom Avinu"?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Bo - Borrowing from Egypt, Negotiations with Pharaoh
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
