A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why is Chanukah (חנוכה) the only mitzvah (מצוה) where one can make a bracha upon seeing someone else perform it? The shiur explains this unique halacha (הלכה) as embodying Chanukah's victory over Greek competitive philosophy. Torah (תורה) celebrates others' spiritual success rather than viewing it as diminishing our own achievement.
This shiur explores a unique halacha (הלכה) specific to Chanukah (חנוכה) - the ability to make a bracha when seeing someone else's Chanukah candles, a privilege that exists by no other mitzvah (מצוה). The speaker explains that this distinctive law reflects the deeper spiritual victory that Chanukah represents over Greek philosophy. The fundamental difference between Torah (תורה) and Greek philosophy lies in their approach to human relationships and motivation. Greek philosophy, epitomized by the Olympics and modern society, is driven by competition where one person's success necessarily reflects another's inadequacy, leading to resentment and begrudging others' achievements. This competitive mindset creates a zero-sum mentality where another's victory represents your defeat, with even the language of being 'beaten' carrying violent connotations. Torah philosophy operates on an entirely different paradigm - never competing with others but only with oneself for personal growth. The unique Chanukah bracha of 'ro'eh' (seeing) embodies this anti-competitive message. When witnessing someone else's Chanukah candles, one can recite both 'She'asah nisim laavoteinu' and even 'Shehecheyanu,' celebrating not one's own mitzvah performance but rejoicing in another person's ability to fulfill a mitzvah. According to the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s position, this bracha can be made even after already lighting one's own candles at home, emphasizing that this is purely about celebrating others' spiritual accomplishments. The rabbis specifically instituted this halacha by Chanukah because the holiday commemorates our victory over Greek culture, and this bracha serves as the ultimate expression of Torah values - having an 'ayin tovah' (good eye) and genuinely rejoicing in others' success. This represents the most fundamentally Jewish message, standing in complete opposition to secular competitive values where joy comes from besting others rather than celebrating their achievements.
Chanukah brachah halachos
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
