No community start suggestion yet.
Why can't bedika alone suffice for chametz removal if we only need to eliminate a kezayis? The Rosh holds that even crumbs smaller than a kezayis carry biblical prohibition (chatzi shiur), making complete physical removal impossible. Therefore bitul becomes essential - it fulfills tashbisu by rendering remaining crumbs hefker.
This shiur presents a detailed analysis of Pesachim 6b, focusing on the Gemara (גמרא)'s discussion of perurin (crumbs) and their halachic status. Rabbi Zweig begins by examining the Sha'agas Aryeh's approach to chatzi shiur (partial measures), explaining that according to this view, chatzi shiur is only biblically forbidden when it can potentially combine (mitstaraf) with another portion to create a full measure. By ownership of chametz (ba'al yera'eh u'ba'al yimatzei), there is no joining since if one possesses half a kezayis and it's destroyed, then acquires another half kezayis, there's no violation - one needs the complete shiur simultaneously. Therefore, the Sha'agas Aryeh concludes there's no biblical prohibition on chatzi shiur for chametz ownership. The shiur then explores the Rosh's interpretation, which differs significantly. The Rosh maintains that perurin involves a din of chatzi shiur, meaning there is indeed a prohibition on less than a kezayis of chametz. This explains why one cannot rely on bedika (searching) alone - since it's impossible to find every tiny crumb, and even pachos mi'kezayis (less than an olive's volume) carries biblical prohibition, one must perform bitul (nullification).
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Pesachim 6b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
