No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Gemara (גמרא) credit Yosef's resistance to Potiphar's wife to seeing his father's image—seemingly undermining a purely moral motive? The Torah (תורה) records two distinct episodes: the first refusal (Bereishis 39:7-9), where Yosef maintains moral high ground, and a second story (39:10-12), after a year of relentless pressure breaks his resolve. Only then, when moral strength has failed and self-destruction looms, does the vision of Yaakov appear. This second story defines true kiddush Hashem (ה׳)—sacrificing everything, including reputation and life, not for personal nobility but to fulfill the Ribbono Shel Olam's master plan.
Rabbi Zweig opens by noting that the story of Yosef and Potiphar's wife—seemingly familiar—contains profound layers most readers miss. The Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah (Perek 5, Halacha (הלכה) 10) identifies Yosef HaTzaddik's resistance to Potiphar's wife as the paradigm of kiddush Hashem (ה׳): doing something purely for the Ribbono Shel Olam's sake, without any personal gain, fear of punishment, or pursuit of honor. Yet the Gemara (גמרא) in Sotah explicitly states that what stopped Yosef was seeing the vision (musaf d'yukno) of his father, who warned him that his name would be erased from the stones of the eifod (the Kohen Gadol's breastplate) if he sinned. This appears to directly contradict the Rambam's premise—Yosef was motivated by the consequence of losing his place among the tribes, seemingly a very external, self-interested motivation. Rabbi Zweig argues that there are actually two distinct episodes in the narrative, not one. The first episode (Bereishis 39:7-9) occurs when Potiphar's wife first propositions Yosef. He refuses emphatically (notice the shalsheles on "vayima'en"—he refused), giving approximately 35 words of moral reasoning: he cannot betray his master's trust, everything has been given into his hands, she alone is withheld because she is his master's wife, and "how can I do this great evil and sin before God?" This is a clear, principled refusal based on morality and halacha. At this stage, the woman's intentions were l'shem shamayim—she had seen astrologically that she would bear children from Yosef, and Rashi (רש"י) indicates she genuinely sought this for a holy purpose.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 39:7-12, Bereishis 49:24
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.