Talmudic University Logo
Rabbi Zweig's Shiurim
Shiurim
Categories
Parshas
Mesechtas
Festivals
Series
About
Log InSign Up
Talmudic University LogoRabbi Zweig's Shiurim
ShiurimCategoriesParshasMesechtasFestivalsSeriesAbout

Search Shiurim

Log InSign Up

Rabbi Zweig's Shiurim

Inspiring Torah learning for Jews around the world. Access hundreds of shiurim on Parsha, Gemara, Navi, and more.

Navigation

  • All Shiurim
  • Categories
  • Search
  • About

Categories

  • Parsha
  • Gemara
  • Navi
  • Holidays

© 2026Rabbi Zweig's Shiurim. All rights reserved.

Website byMakra.ca
Home/Gemara
Back to Home
Gemaraadvanced

Pesachim 114a: Dipping Requirements and Intentionality in Mitzvot

50:40
Audio Only
Festival: Pesach (פסח)
Share:WhatsAppEmail

Audio

Sign in to listen

A free account is required to play audio and download files.

Sign inCreate account
Sign in to download

Short Summary

An analysis of the Mishnah (משנה)'s requirement for two dippings at the Seder, focusing on the debate between Rashi (רש"י) and Tosafot regarding whether hasaibah (reclining) is needed for karpas, and exploring the fundamental question of whether mitzvot require specific intention (kavana).

Full Summary

This shiur examines Pesachim 114a, beginning with the Mishnah (משנה)'s requirement for karpas dipping and the subsequent dipping with charoset near the matzah. Rabbi Zweig analyzes the fundamental disagreement between Rashi (רש"י) and Tosafot regarding whether one needs hasaibah (reclining) for karpas. Rashi holds that hasaibah is required only when there is a din of derech cherut (manner of freedom), which applies to matzah but not to karpas. Tosafot disagrees, arguing that hasaibah is not comfortable and therefore not truly derech cherut. The shiur explores how this disagreement manifests in their interpretations of why the Mishnah mentions bringing items 'on the table' in some cases but not others. According to Rashi, the table (shulchan) is brought only when hasaibah is required, explaining the textual variations in the Mishnah. The discussion then turns to the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s position that karpas requires a kezayit portion, which implies hasaibah is needed since it constitutes a proper eating. This leads to an analysis of the tension between eating less than a kezayit (to avoid requiring a berachah achronah) versus the implications for the mitzvah (מצוה)'s validity. A central focus is the principle of mitzvot tzrichot kavana - whether mitzvot require specific intention. The Gemara (גמרא) presents a case where someone eats charoset (bitter herbs) for karpas without making the berachah 'al achilat maror.' Rashi explains that because he made only borei pri ha'adamah, we assume he wasn't intending to fulfill the mitzvah of maror, demonstrating that mitzvot require kavana. The shiur examines the dispute between Rav Huna and Rav Chisda regarding when to make the berachah for maror in such cases. The analysis extends to the Yerushalmi's requirement for exactly seven berachot at the Seder, with various opinions about which berachot constitute the required seven. This affects the timing of when one makes 'al achilat maror.' Rabbi Zweig also addresses a fundamental question about the entire sugya: if karpas can be eaten in quantities less than a kezayit, how can there be any question about fulfilling the mitzvah of maror? This suggests that according to the Gemara's assumption, karpas must involve eating a kezayit. The shiur concludes with an exploration of the Rambam's position that every kezayit of matzah eaten on the first night constitutes a separate mitzvah, raising questions about whether the same applies to maror and how this affects berachot and timing requirements.

You might also like

Gemara
Audio Only

Pesachim 6a: Rambam's Approach to Chametz Responsibilities and Obligations

An in-depth analysis of the Rambam's understanding of chametz laws on Pesach, focusing on the distinction between personal chametz ownership and acting as a guardian (shomer) for others' chametz.

58:56
Listen now
Gemara
Audio Only

Pesachim 6a: Covering Chametz with a Vessel - Muktzeh vs. Prevention

An analysis of Gemara Pesachim 6a discussing whether one may cover chametz with a vessel on Yom Tov, examining the dispute between Rashi and Tosafot regarding muktzeh restrictions and the obligation of bitul (nullification).

Back to Gemara

Topics

karpashasaibahrecliningmitzvot tzrichot kavanaintention in mitzvotcharosetmarorberachotSederderech cherut

Source Reference

Pesachim 114a

Sign in to access full transcripts

1:06:50
Listen now
Gemara
Audio Only

Pesachim 6a: Bitul Chametz and the Nature of Hefker

Analysis of when chametz becomes batel (nullified) on Pesach, examining Rashi's position that bitul creates hefker status and exploring the underlying principles of ownership, chashuv (importance), and the relationship between bitul and tashbitu.

1:05:57
Listen now
Gemara
Audio Only

Pesachim 6b: Bitul Chametz and Mechuyav L'Saref

Rabbi Zweig analyzes a complex Gemara discussing whether one can be mevatel (nullify) chametz after zman isur (when the prohibition begins) and the obligation to burn chametz found on Pesach.

1:05:48
Listen now