A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why do Sephardim say 'Mattisyah' while Ashkenazim say 'Mattisyahu' in Al Hanissim? The difference reflects a machlokes about whether Chanukah (חנוכה) involved one miracle or two. The Tzlach's position that the ner mitzrah miracle from the First Temple was also restored justifies the full divine name ending, while those who hold only the oil miracle occurred maintain the Second Temple context.
This shiur examines a fascinating linguistic and halachic difference in the Al Hanissim prayer, where Sephardim say 'Mattisyah' while Ashkenazim say 'Mattisyahu.' The speaker explains that this dispute extends to practical halacha (הלכה) in Hilchos Gittin regarding how to write names in divorce documents. The fundamental distinction stems from different patterns of divine names between the First and Second Temple periods. In Bayit Rishon (First Temple), names ended with 'Yehu' (like Yirmiyahu, Yeshaya), representing the full divine name yud-hey-vav-hey due to the complete hashraas hashechinah (divine presence). In Bayit Sheni (Second Temple), names ended with 'Yah' (yud-hey only), reflecting a diminished level of divine presence. The speaker then presents the Tzlach's innovative explanation for why Chanukah (חנוכה) is celebrated for eight days rather than seven. The Tzlach explains that in the First Temple, there was a daily miracle where the ner mitzrah (western candle) burned for twenty-four hours while all other candles burned only twelve hours, despite having identical amounts of oil and wicks. This miracle ceased in the Second Temple period. However, during the Chanukah miracle, the Tzlach argues that the ner mitzrah resumed burning for twenty-four hours, creating a second miracle alongside the oil lasting eight days. This restoration of the First Temple's miracle meant the Chanukah menorah possessed the spiritual quality of Bayit Rishon, justifying the Ashkenazi pronunciation 'Mattisyahu' with the full divine name. The Sephardic position, following the Beit Yosef who doesn't accept this explanation, maintains that only the standard oil miracle occurred, keeping the Second Temple context and therefore using 'Mattisyah.' This analysis demonstrates how pronunciation differences in liturgy can reflect deep theological positions about the nature of miracles and divine presence.
Al Hanissim prayer, Hilchos Gittin
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
Why does the Gemara connect Purim to Tisha B'Av using "just like"—here you *decrease* joy, here you *increase* it? The shiur develops that Purim fixes the sin of Achashverosh's feast, where Klal Yisrael's desire to socialize with goyim revealed a physical disconnection from each other. Mishloach Manot and matanos la'evyonim create the physical unity—eating and drinking together—that is the tikkun for sinas chinam and the foundation for Kabbalas HaTorah.
Why is the Haggadah in Aramaic, and what does "haggadah" (which means both storytelling and harsh speech) really mean? The shiur develops that Aramaic represents the ability to see from another's perspective, the foundation of true communication. Pesach night's she'eilah u'teshuvah (question-and-answer) format demands we understand what the listener truly needs to hear—creating unity through genuine dialogue rather than prepared speeches.
Why did Mordecai provoke Haman by refusing to bow, endangering all the Jews? Rabbi Zweig argues Mordecai read history and saw the Jewish people on the brink of spiritual destruction—enjoying Achashverosh's party celebrating Judaism's demise meant they had become self-hating. By provoking a crisis, Mordecai forced Jews to face that assimilation was no refuge and reconnect to their roots.
