A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why is Asara B'Teves uniquely stringent among fast days, even overriding Shabbos (שבת) preparation? The siege of Jerusalem marks the reversal of the fourth stage of redemption—receiving the Torah (תורה)—which grants true freedom. Just as four languages of geulah brought us from slavery to freedom, four fast days trace our return to bondage, with Asara B'Teves destroying our sense of etzem (selfhood) and the ability to go "in and out" that defines Torah Shebeal Peh.
This shiur explores why Asara B'Teves (the Tenth of Teves) holds unique stringency among the four fast days commemorating the destruction of the Temple and exile. Unlike the other fasts—Tisha B'Av, Shiva Asar B'Tammuz, and Tzom Gedaliah—which are postponed if they fall on Shabbos (שבת) or Friday, Asara B'Teves would be observed even on Shabbos itself (were our calendar to allow it). The Abudraham explains this based on the phrase "b'etzem hayom hazeh" (on this very day) used by the prophet Yechezkel, the same phrase associated with Yom Kippur. But why does Asara B'Teves, which marks merely the beginning of Jerusalem's siege—seemingly less tragic than the Temple's destruction on Tisha B'Av—carry greater halachic weight? The key lies in understanding the parallel structure between redemption and exile. Just as the Torah (תורה) describes the Exodus with four languages of geulah (v'hotzeisi, v'hitzalti, v'ga'alti, v'lakachti), requiring us to drink four cups of wine at the Seder, so too the process of returning to galus unfolds in four stages, each commemorated by a separate fast day. The Ramban (רמב"ן) explains these four redemption stages: (1) ceasing slave labor in Egypt, (2) no longer paying tribute as a colony, (3) being willingly given over to Hashem (ה׳) (geulah—showing His special relationship with us), and (4) receiving the Torah. The fourth stage represents true freedom, as the Gemara (גמרא) states: "Ein ben chorin ela mi she'oseik b'Torah"—there is no free person except one who engages in Torah study.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Yechezkel on Asara B'Teves; Avos 6:2 (ein ben chorin); Vayikra 25:10 (Yovel); Shemos 32-34 (luchos shniyos)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
How can sinas chinam lead someone to harm himself even more than his enemy? The shiur develops that sinas chinam requires self-hatred first — only someone alienated from himself will damage himself to hurt others. The Bar Kamtsa host and R. Zecharya ben Avkulas both exhibited this self-alienation, showing that proper anava restores love of both self and others.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
