No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Ben Sorer Umoreh receive capital punishment for merely stealing meat and wine? The shiur develops a yesod that he is driven not by pleasure, but by the pain of non-existence—the same existential angst that permits a soldier to take a Yefas Toar. His rebellion against his parents reveals that he views life itself as painful, creating an unstoppable pursuit that justifies the Torah (תורה)'s al shem sofo judgment.
Rabbi Zweig addresses the fundamental difficulty of Yefas Toar: how can the Torah (תורה) permit a soldier to live with a non-Jewish woman—normally a capital offense of kana'im pog'im bo—based on the principle of lo dibra Torah keneged yetzer hara? This seems to contradict the Torah's entire foundation that we must control ourselves. The question deepens when we consider that only the greatest tzadikim went to war—those who never spoke between Tefillin shel yad and Tefillin shel rosh—yet the Torah assumes they cannot control their actions. Furthermore, later in the same parsha, soldiers in a war camp must control even their thoughts (v'nishmartem mikol davar ra), maintaining an environment free from improper images. How can the Torah demand absolute thought control yet permit lack of action control? Rashi (רש"י) on the pasuk "Remember what Hashem (ה׳) did to Miriam" reveals a profound insight. The simple reading suggests we should avoid lashon hara by remembering the punishment. But Rashi writes: "If you don't want tzaraas on your body, don't speak lashon hara." This implies the natural human condition is that everyone will speak lashon hara and get tzaraas—the mitzvah (מצוה) is offered only as a way to avoid tzaraas, not as the expected norm. The Gemara (גמרא) in Erchin reinforces this, where the snake asks: "What pleasure is there in speaking lashon hara?" just as there is no pleasure in his biting. If lashon hara provides no pleasure, why is it the universal human condition?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Ki Seitzei 21:10-21
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
