No community start suggestion yet.
How can one fulfill both Krias Shema of Arvis and Shacharis during the overlapping period between amud hashachar and netz hachamah? The shiur analyzes whether 'beshachbecha' means 'when you sleep' or 'when focused on sleep,' showing how this distinction resolves the Ba'al Hamaor's fundamental question about simultaneous obligations.
This shiur provides an in-depth analysis of Brachos 8b-9a, focusing on the fundamental machloket regarding the proper times for reciting Krias Shema. The Gemara (גמרא) presents two interpretations of Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai's position: the first holds that Krias Shema of Arvis can be said until amud hashachar, after which only Krias Shema of Shacharis applies; the second maintains that Krias Shema of Arvis continues until netz hachamah. The core issue is the Ba'al Hamaor's question: how can one be yotzei both Krias Shema of Arvis and Shacharis simultaneously during the overlapping time period? The Rif rules that both interpretations are valid, allowing for both recitations between amud hashachar and netz hachamah. The Ramban (רמב"ן) responds that there's no contradiction since most people are awake by this time (making it zman kima), while some are still sleeping (maintaining it as zman shekiva), thus permitting both. The shiur examines Tosafos (תוספות)' complex analysis, which presents two approaches: first, that the periods are mutually exclusive - if some people are getting up, it's no longer zman shekiva for Krias Shema of Arvis; second, that both can coexist during this transitional period. A key insight emerges regarding the definition of 'beshachbecha' - whether it means 'when you are sleeping' versus 'when you are focused on going to sleep.' According to the first interpretation, once people begin rising (even if only some), others won't return to sleep, thus ending the zman shekiva period. The second interpretation defines beshachbecha simply as when people are sleeping, allowing for overlap since some remain asleep even as others rise. The shiur also addresses the relationship between Krias Shema and tefillin times, noting Tosafos' position that Krias Shema time begins before tefillin time (contrary to Rashi (רש"י)). The analysis concludes that the fundamental dispute reflects different understandings of whether these time periods operate according to absolute day/night cycles (like other mitzvos) or according to the specific behavioral patterns described by beshachbecha u'vekumecha. This creates practical ramifications for when one can fulfill the obligation of Krias Shema and highlights the sophisticated halachic reasoning employed by the Rishonim in resolving apparent contradictions in the Talmudic text.
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does saying Ashrei three times daily guarantee a share in the World to Come? The verse 'umasbia l'chol chai ratzon' reveals that God provides not just sustenance but pleasure to all creation out of pure love. This recognition teaches us that even basic needs are expressions of divine chesed, creating the foundation for love-motivated service through both major and minor mitzvos.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Brachos 8b-9a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Should one learn Torah full-time trusting in Divine providence, or combine learning with work? The shiur distinguishes between Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai's approach of complete separation from worldly concerns versus Rabbi Shmuel's view that proper work itself becomes part of Torah. The key insight: true emunah means learning without demanding sustenance from either Hashem or community, unlike having a 'contract' expecting payment for learning.
