A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Rambam (רמב"ם) include extensive historical background in Hilchos Chanukah (חנוכה) before stating the actual mitzvah (מצוה)? The real mitzvah is hodaya (gratitude) for the miracles, not merely hadlakas neris. Lighting candles is just the token - the essence is cultivating genuine hakaras hatov, which requires understanding what we're thanking Hashem (ה׳) for.
The shiur begins by examining the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s Hilchos Chanukah (חנוכה), questioning why the Rambam unusually provides extensive historical background before presenting the actual mitzvah (מצוה). Unlike other halachos where he proceeds directly to the law, here he details both the military victory and the miracle of the oil. The speaker argues this is not mere history but essential to understanding the mitzvah itself. The central thesis emerges that Chanukah is fundamentally about hodaya (gratitude/thanksgiving) rather than hadlakas neris (lighting candles). The lighting is merely a token - the real mitzvah is l'hodos ul'halel (to thank and praise). This explains why the Rambam includes the historical context: without understanding the reasons for Chanukah, one cannot properly fulfill the obligation of expressing gratitude.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Rambam Hilchos Chanukah 3:1-3
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
