No community start suggestion yet.
How much does each witness pay when eidim zomemim attempted to impose a monetary obligation? The Gemara (גמרא) explores whether witnesses have joint liability (50% each) or several liability (100% each if the other disappears). The analysis reveals that witnesses aren't considered resha'im at all when contradicted.
This shiur analyzes Gemara (גמרא) Makkos 2b regarding the liability of eidim zomemim in monetary cases. The Gemara states that Rabbi Akiva holds eidim zomemim pay as a knas (fine) according to the principle "asher zamam la'asot" - they suffer what they intended to cause. The discussion begins with Rashi (רש"י)'s seemingly redundant language explaining that when witnesses are contradicted, "lo horgu adam v'lo nerag adam al pihem" - no one was killed and no one was executed based on their testimony. The core question emerges from Rav Nachman's teaching that eidim zomemim pay "l'fi chelko" (according to his portion). The Gemara asks whether this means each witness pays only half their share, or whether they have full responsibility but practically split the payment. This connects to whether beis din acts as a shalish (trustee) holding money to ensure the victim receives full compensation, or merely facilitates division between the two witnesses.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Makkos 2b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
