No community start suggestion yet.
Why was On Ben Peles saved from Korach's rebellion while others perished? The Talmud (תלמוד) credits the wisdom of his wife versus the foolishness of Korach's wife. A wise woman nurtures her husband's potential rather than trying to reshape him into someone else.
This shiur explores the profound difference between a wise woman and a foolish woman through the lens of Parshas Korach, drawing from Talmud (תלמוד) Sanhedrin 119b. Rabbi Zweig begins with a personal anecdote from his yeshiva reunion, where he observed that his predictions about students' futures were consistently wrong - those he expected to succeed often didn't reach their potential, while those he dismissed became community leaders. This led him to question what factors truly determine success. The Talmud explains that during Korach's rebellion, all conspirators were destroyed except On Ben Peles, who was saved by his wife's wisdom. The Gemara (גמרא) quotes Mishlei: "Chochmas nashim banah baysah" - the wisdom of women builds the home (referring to On Ben Peles' wife), while "iveiles b'yadeha techaresena" - a foolish woman destroys her home with her own hands (referring to Korach's wife).
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Sanhedrin 119b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why are sins automatically forgiven for three categories - converts, those elevated to leadership, and those who marry - without any teshuvah required? The shiur distinguishes between soulmate marriages (which create complete identity transformation) and companion marriages, using Esav's third wife as the paradigm. When true soulmates unite, they literally become new people, explaining why sins are forgiven rather than merely sealed.
Why does the Torah emphasize Esav selling his birthright over his other sins like murder and adultery? The key insight is that "vayivez" means Esav despised himself, not just the birthright - reflecting devastating self-worth issues rooted in inconsistent parental love and unproductive time use. Poor self-image is worse than behavioral sins because it can't be simply repented from and blocks all growth.
What does it mean that Leah was 'hated' despite being loved by Yaakov? The shiur redefines hatred (sina) not as animosity but as having separate agendas - two people can love yet remain fundamentally divided in priorities. Yaakov's seven years of labor for Rochel exemplifies making your spouse your agenda rather than maintaining parallel lives.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
