No community start suggestion yet.
How do we understand the Gemara (גמרא)'s discussion of delayed marriage due to illness versus rabbinical decree? The shiur develops two distinct approaches: illness as true onas (exempting circumstance) versus rabbinical extension of the obligation's timeframe. This distinction affects when a husband becomes obligated in spousal support.
This shiur analyzes Kesubos 2a, focusing on a fundamental machlokes between two interpretations (lishnos) in the Gemara (גמרא) regarding delayed marriage obligations. The central issue involves understanding why certain circumstances exempt a man from providing mezonos (spousal support) when marriage is delayed. Rabbi Zweig begins by examining the Maharsha's position that distinguishes between delays "for his sake" versus "for her sake." The Maharsha argues that when a rabbinical decree (takanas chachamim) delays marriage for the groom's benefit, he remains obligated in mezonos because he's not truly an onas (in exempting circumstances). However, when the delay benefits the bride, such as with the three-day preparation period, he's exempt from mezonos. Rabbi Zweig raises difficulties with this approach, noting that the Gemara's language ("lefikach chalah") suggests the opposite of the Maharsha's reading.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 2a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
