No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Gemara (גמרא) in Pesachim 114b use a complex case to derive that mitzvos tzrichos kavanah when simpler examples exist? The shiur resolves an apparent contradiction in the Rambam (רמב"ם) by distinguishing between kavanah for fulfillment versus kavanah for proper ma'aseh hamitzvah. When one action could serve multiple mitzvos, intention directs which mitzvah (מצוה) the act accomplishes.
This shiur presents a profound analysis of the sugya of mitzvos tzrichos kavanah found in Pesachim 114b. The Gemara (גמרא) discusses a case where one uses the same vegetable (chazereth) for both karpas and maror, and Reish Lakish derives from this that mitzvos tzrichos kavanah - mitzvos require intention. However, Rabbi Zweig questions why this complex case is used to establish such a fundamental principle when simpler cases exist. The shiur then examines an apparent contradiction in the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s rulings. In Hilchos Chametz U'Matzah, the Rambam states that one who eats matzah without proper intention still fulfills the obligation, suggesting mitzvos ain tzrichos kavanah. Yet in Hilchos Rosh Hashanah, he clearly requires intention for shofar, stating that both the listener and the one blowing must have proper kavanah. The Rishonim offer various resolutions, with the Magid Mishna distinguishing between ma'aseh mitzvos (action-based) and non-ma'aseh mitzvos.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Pesachim 114b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
