A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why do Sheva Berachos apply to yibum when the primary purpose is procreation, not relationship? The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s ruling that yibum requires ma'amar reveals that Birchas Nisuin centers on establishing relationship awareness. This differs fundamentally from the Rosh's view that marriage is merely a vehicle for fulfilling pru urvu.
This shiur analyzes the nature and purpose of Birchas Nisuin (Sheva Berachos) through a careful examination of the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s rulings in Hilchos Ishus and Hilchos Berachos. The analysis begins with a fundamental question: why does the Gemara (גמרא) in Kesubos 7b discuss whether an alman (widower) marrying an almana (widow) requires Sheva Berachos, and why doesn't it simply distinguish between the chuppah ceremony and the week-long celebration? Rabbi Zweig identifies significant contradictions in the Rambam's presentation. In Hilchos Ishus, the Rambam requires Sheva Berachos before nisuin but states that if omitted, they can be recited even years later. Conversely, regarding Birchas Erusin, once kiddushin is performed without the blessing, it cannot be recited afterward as it becomes a bracha levatala. Additionally, the Rambam presents different orders for the Sheva Berachos in different places and varying requirements regarding who can participate in the minyan.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kesubos 7b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
