No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) use different language for returning lost objects in different contexts? The shiur develops three distinct levels of hashavas aveidah based on whether the owner knows his loss. The ultimate obligation isn't just returning property but restoring a person's da'as - his inner awareness and connection to reality outside himself.
This shiur analyzes the mitzvah (מצוה) of hashavas aveidah in Parshas Ki Seitzei, exploring why the Torah (תורה) presents different formulations of this obligation in different contexts. Rabbi Zweig begins by questioning the connection between the law of removing a hanging corpse and the subsequent laws of returning lost objects, as well as why certain phrases appear in Ki Seitzei but not in the parallel passage in Mishpatim. The shiur develops a fundamental three-tiered understanding of hashavas aveidah. The first level, found in Mishpatim, deals with objects you find knowing who the owner is - simply a matter of not saying "finders keepers" and returning the item. This represents basic justice that even non-Jews understand. The second level involves taking responsibility for lost objects even when you don't know the owner, requiring you to safeguard the item, investigate ownership, and maintain it properly until the owner is found.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Ki Seitzei 22:1-3
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
