No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Mishna call witnesses who testify that a kohen is a ben gerusha 'eidim zomemim' when they don't receive the standard hazamah punishment? The shiur develops that the Torah (תורה) requires eidim zomemim conviction standards even when excluding the usual kazamat punishment. The conviction must meet hazamah criteria, but the punishment becomes malkus rather than reciprocal consequences.
The shiur begins with a textual question on the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s codification of the Tosefta's ruling about ben gerusha, ben chalutza, noting that while the Rambam typically follows Tosefta when there's no disagreement with Bavli, he omits the specific case of mamzer mentioned in the Tosefta. This leads into the main Gemara (גמרא) discussion. The central question emerges from Ula's statement asking for a remez (hint) for eidim zomemim from the Torah (תורה). Rabbi Zweig identifies a fundamental difficulty: the Gemara just established that in cases of ben gerusha and ben chalutza, there is no din hazamah - no standard eidim zomemim punishment of 'ka'asher zamam.' Yet the Mishna refers to these witnesses as 'eidim zomemim.' This seems contradictory.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Makkos 2b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
