A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Gemara (גמרא) require drinking on Purim (פורים) until we cannot distinguish between cursing Haman and blessing Mordechai? The Maharal explains that Purim celebrates physical survival, so we demonstrate through intoxication that even without intellectual control, our physical selves remain connected to Hashem (ה׳) through internalized Torah (תורה). This counters Amalek's claim that physical existence is separate from the divine.
Rabbi Yeshaya Greenberg ZT"L begins by addressing the halachos of drinking on Purim (פורים), clarifying that the Rema permits fulfilling the mitzvah (מצוה) through drinking wine and learning, not necessarily drinking more than learning. He notes that while wine is preferred (mitzvah min hamuvchar), he has received a tradition that other alcoholic beverages can also fulfill the mitzvah when necessary. However, he emphasizes the crucial caveat from the Mishnah (משנה) Berurah that one must not drink if it will lead to neglecting other mitzvos or acting inappropriately. The rabbi shares his personal observation that Bnei Torah (תורה) generally maintain their dignity even when intoxicated on Purim, demonstrating the transformative power of Torah learning. The core question addressed is the meaning of 'chayav inish l'vasumei b'Puraya ad d'lo yada bein arur Haman l'varuch Mordechai' (a person is obligated to become intoxicated on Purim until he cannot distinguish between 'cursed is Haman' and 'blessed is Mordechai'). Rabbi Yeshaya Greenberg ZT"L references the famous Gemara (גמרא) about Rabbah and Rav Zeira, where Rabbah killed Rav Zeira during a Purim feast and then revived him through prayer, leading to a complex discussion about the limits and expectations of Purim intoxication. The Maharal's explanation forms the centerpiece of the shiur. According to the Maharal, the difference between Chanukah (חנוכה) and Purim lies in the nature of the threat: Chanukah involved spiritual persecution (shmad), so we celebrate with spiritual activities like songs and praise; Purim involved physical destruction, so we celebrate physically. However, the deeper purpose is to demonstrate that even when we lose our intellectual control (sechel) through intoxication, our physical selves can still serve Hashem (ה׳). This proves the eternal connection between our physical existence and the divine. Rabbi Yeshaya Greenberg ZT"L connects this to the fundamental issue of the sin of the Tree of Knowledge (Etz haDa'as), which created a separation between the spiritual (neshamah) and physical (guf) aspects of humanity. The Gemara's reference to Haman through 'hamin ha'etz' links Haman to this primordial sin. Amalek's goal is to sever the connection between physical existence and eternity (nitzchiyus), claiming that physical matter can exist independently of Hashem and therefore has no eternal significance. The mitzvah of drinking on Purim counters this by demonstrating that even when our intellectual faculties are impaired, our physical selves maintain their connection to the divine through the Torah that has become part of our essence. This represents a unique form of divine service that emphasizes the physical realm's potential for holiness. Rabbi Yeshaya Greenberg ZT"L explains why Purim represents the ultimate tikkun (rectification), comparing it to Yom Kippur. While Yom Kippur de-emphasizes the physical to focus on the spiritual, Purim accomplishes the opposite but equally important task of elevating the physical itself. This is why Chazal say that in the future, when all festivals will be nullified, Purim will remain eternal. The shiur concludes with an analysis of the Gemara comparing Esther to 'ayeles hashachar' (morning star). The paradox is explained: while Purim appears to be a hidden miracle (neis nistar) compared to the revealed miracles (nissim gluyim) of earlier times, it actually represents the ultimate revelation. Through the experience of hester panim (divine concealment), the Jewish people achieved the greatest recognition that they cannot exist without serving Hashem. This realization, born from apparent abandonment, produced a deeper and more lasting connection than all the open miracles of the past, making Purim the 'morning' that ends the 'night' of all previous miracles.
Megillah 7b - chayav inish l'vasumei b'Puraya
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How was Yitzchok comforted after Sarah's death through marrying Rivka? The Hebrew 'vayinachem' means both comfort and change of direction, revealing that healing comes through shifting focus outward. Depression and mourning are self-absorbed states; true comfort emerges when we channel our pain into caring for others.
How could Avrohom keep the entire Torah before it was given, including rabbinical laws? The key insight is that mitzvos represent eternal spiritual realities, not just historical commemorations, so Avrohom could access these truths through his genuine search. His entire 172-year journey—even his early idolatry—retroactively became service of God once he reached ultimate truth.
Why does the Gemara say Avrohom knew God from age three while the Rambam says forty, after describing his idolatrous past? The principle that baalei teshuvah transform past sins into merits explains how Avrohom's early struggles became retroactive mitzvos once he used that experience to reach other idol worshippers. Unlike Shem and Ever who lacked such background, Avrohom's difficult past became his greatest qualification for helping others.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
