No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) call kidnapping "genevah" (theft) when it involves face-to-face taking, which should be "gezeilah" (robbery)? The shiur develops a fundamental chakira: genevah targets property for gain, while gezeilah targets the person to humiliate. Kidnapping seeks financial benefit through selling the victim, making it genevah—ultimately, stealing Hashem (ה׳)'s property (a Jew), which parallels swearing falsely (stealing Hashem's name).
Rabbi Zweig analyzes the prohibition of "Lo Tignov" (Thou shall not steal) from the Ten Commandments, beginning with Rashi (רש"י)'s explanation that this refers specifically to kidnapping (genevah nefashos), not monetary theft. The question arises: why is kidnapping called "genevah" rather than "gezeilah"? Rav Tzalach Ashkenazi notes that genevah typically involves taking without the victim's knowledge, while gezeilah involves open robbery where the victim is aware. Kidnapping clearly involves the victim's awareness, so it should logically be classified as gezeilah. The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s formulation of the laws of genevah versus gezeilah reveals critical distinctions. In genevah, the Rambam writes "kol hagonev mamon mi'shaveh prutah u'lemala" (whoever steals money worth a penny and upward), while in gezeilah he writes only "kol hagozel le'chavero shaveh prutah" (whoever robs from his friend a penny's worth). The phrase "u'lemala" teaches that whether one steals a penny or a dollar, it constitutes a single transgression. In gezeilah, the Rambam omits this phrase, suggesting that each increment of value might constitute a separate sin.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 20:13 (Lo Tignov - Aseres HaDibros)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!